A Phenomenological Study of Digital Nomads: Redefining Work-Life Boundaries in the Gig Economy

Authors

  • Muhammad Furqon Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Annisa Tri Ananda Dewi Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Keywords:

Digital Nomads, Work-Life Balance, Boundary Management, Gig Economy

Abstract

This study aims to explore how digital nomads in the gig economy manage their work-life boundaries and the strategies they employ to achieve a balance between professional and personal lives. Given the increasing prevalence of remote work, particularly within the digital nomad community, this research investigates the challenges and methods used by individuals to navigate these boundaries. A qualitative research design, involving semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and diary studies, was employed to collect data from digital nomads across various locations. The findings reveal that time-blocking, spatial segmentation, and technology play key roles in managing work-life boundaries. However, challenges such as blurred boundaries, isolation, and the constant pressure of being always "on" were also identified. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of work-life balance in the context of global mobility and digital nomadism. The implications of this study suggest that digital nomads need more structured boundary management strategies, and organizations supporting remote work should consider providing tools and resources to enhance boundary control. This research also offers practical insights for improving the well-being and productivity of remote workers in the evolving gig economy.

References

Adisa, T., Antonacopoulou, E., Beauregard, T., Dickmann, M., & Adekoya, O. (2022). Exploring the Impact of COVID‐19 on Employees’ Boundary Management and Work–Life Balance. British Journal of Management, 33, 1694–1709. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12643

Aroles, J., Bonneau, C., & Bhankaraully, S. (2022). Conceptualising ‘Meta-Work’ in the Context of Continuous, Global Mobility: The Case of Digital Nomadism. Work, Employment and Society, 37, 1261–1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211069797

Cho, J., Beck, S., & Voida, S. (2022). Topophilia, Placemaking, and Boundary Work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492843

Cook, D. (2023). What is a digital nomad? Definition and taxonomy in the era of mainstream remote work. World Leisure Journal, 65, 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2023.2190608

De La Vega, J. C. A., Cecchinato, M., Rooksby, J., & Newbold, J. (2023). Understanding Platform Mediated Work-Life: A Diary Study with Gig Economy Freelancers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579539

Hall, S., & Liebenberg, L. (2024). Qualitative Description as an Introductory Method to Qualitative Research for Master’s-Level Students and Research Trainees. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241242264

Hilpi, K., Heini, P., & Rebekah, R. (2023). I wouldn’t be working this way if I had a family - Differences in remote workers’ needs for supervisor’s family-supportiveness depending on the parental status. Journal of Vocational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103939

Hunter‐Pazzara, B. (2022). Digital Nomads: In Search of Freedom, Community, and Meaningful Work in the New Economy. Rachel A.Woldoff and Robert C.Litchfield. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. 240 pp. Economic Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12229

Khudhair, A., Li, H., Bower, T., & Ren, G. (2022). A theoretical holistic decision-making framework supporting collaborative design based on common data analysis (CDA) method. Journal of Building Engineering, 46, 103686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103686

Kim, J. H., Kim, J., Oh, S. J., Yun, S., Song, H., Jeong, J., ... & Song, H. O. (2022, June). Dataset condensation via efficient synthetic-data parameterization. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 11102-11118). PMLR. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/kim22c.html

Koll, E., Wang, X., & Lin, M. (2025). Digital nomadism as a form of travel: A phenomenological study of going on a workation. Tourism Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2025.105185

Lim, W. M. (2024). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33, 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619

Lyzwinski, L.-N. (2024). Organizational and occupational health issues with working remotely during the pandemic: a scoping review of remote work and health. Journal of Occupational Health, 66. https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae005

Mancinelli, F., & Molz, J. G. (2023). Moving with and against the state: digital nomads and frictional mobility regimes. Mobilities, 19, 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2023.2209825

Marx, J., Mirbabaie, M., & Stieglitz, S. (2025). Corporate Nomads: Working at the Boundary Between Corporate Work and Digital Nomadism. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 26, 9. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00927

Mathur, G., Gulati, C., Sankpal, S., & Kee, D. M. H. (2024). Work‐life balance and withdrawal behaviors among knowledge workforce: High performance work system comes into play for managing boundaries. Global Business and Organizational Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22257

Prester, J., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Schlagwein, D. (2023). Toward a Theory of Identity Performance in Unsettled Digital Work: The Becoming of ‘Digital Nomads.’ Journal of Information Technology, 38, 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962231196310

Pyo, J., Lee, W., Choi, E., Jang, S., & Ock, M. (2023). Qualitative Research in Healthcare: Necessity and Characteristics. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 56, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.451

Rainoldi, M., Ladkin, A., & Buhalis, D. (2025). Digital nomads’ work-leisure management practices. Annals of Tourism Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2025.103904

Rauf, A., Parham, S., & Sheehan, C. (2023). Work-life balance and remote working in the pandemic and beyond: the lived experiences of university academics in The Netherlands and UK. European Journal of Higher Education, 15, 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2023.2273554

Seeber, I., & Erhardt, J. (2023). Working from Home with Flexible and Permeable Boundaries. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00801-2

Sengupta, D., & Al-Khalifa, D. (2022). Pandemic Imposed Remote Work Arrangements and Resultant Work-Life Integration, Future of Work and Role of Leaders—A Qualitative Study of Indian Millennial Workers. Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040162

Song, X., & Gong, B. (2025). The impact of boundary crossing on well-being among remote workers and the moderating role of nonwork role re-engagement (NWRR). Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebhrm-06-2024-0225

Suckley, L., & Orel, M. (2024). Adjusting and re-adjusting: learnings from the experience of coworkers for the future of coworking and shared working spaces. Journal of Workplace Learning. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-11-2022-0162

Wu, D., & Huang, J. (2024). Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.27751

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

How to Cite

Furqon, M., & Dewi, A. T. A. (2026). A Phenomenological Study of Digital Nomads: Redefining Work-Life Boundaries in the Gig Economy . Econoisia Journal, 1(1), 1–9. Retrieved from https://cendikianusantara.com/index.php/Econoisia/article/view/11

Issue

Section

Articles